We took our time getting this right. Finally, AI that actually works for lawyers. Draft more intelligently, review more quickly. All this saved time allows you to focus on winning more cases.
Transforming your most difficult legal tasks into efficient, stress-free processes.
Contracts, briefs, and other legal documents can be created, edited, and reviewed by LegalSync in a matter of minutes, saving hours of required mental work while still preserving flawless accuracy.
LegalSync helps you produce accurate, dependable work every time by identifying missed clauses, inconsistencies, and possible problems, giving clients and partners next level confidence in every document.
LegalSync doesn’t just follow templates, it adapts to your specific case context, ensuring every clause, reference, and tone fits the situation perfectly.
Share, review, and finalize documents in real time. LegalSync keeps every team member aligned, reducing back-and-forth emails and miscommunications.
LegalSync analyzes your documents for potential legal and compliance risks before they reach clients or partners, giving you a proactive edge no other AI offers.
Your AI learns your preferred tone, style, and formatting, ensuring every contract, brief, or memo feels like it came straight from you — consistently professional and precise.
LegalSync scans all related case files, emails, and documents to generate a concise, easy-to-read summary. Jump straight into drafting or strategy without spending hours reviewing everything.
LegalSync analyzes your case facts, surfaces relevant precedents, and highlights strategies that led to wins in similar cases. Draft smarter with real-world insights, not just raw references.
LegalSync analyzes similar past cases and contract outcomes to suggest language and approaches that increase your chances of success, giving you a tactical edge every time.
Answer: Potentially, yes with some. But Legalsync it's impossible. Inputting sensitive, confidential client data into a third-party AI tool, especially a large language model (LLM) that may use the data for future training, can violate the lawyer's duty of confidentiality (Model Rule 1.6). Firms must choose secure, vetted, and legal AI tools like Legalsync that have strong privacy agreements that do not use client data for model training.
Answer: The Lawyer is ultimately responsible. The use of AI does not absolve a lawyer of their professional duties. If an AI generates a flawed legal brief, fabricates case law ("hallucinations"), or offers incorrect advice, the supervising attorney is accountable for the resulting legal malpractice or ethical violations. Human oversight and verification are mandatory.
Answer: Not really. But through mandatory, careful human legal review and source verification like Legalsync, it can. AI output, particularly from general-purpose generative AI, can contain factual errors or "hallucinations." Lawyers must treat AI output like work from a non-lawyer assistant—it requires rigorous checking against authoritative legal sources before being submitted to a court or given to a client. And this is why Legalsync outshines the competition.
Answer: It requires a reasonable understanding of the tool's benefits and risks but Legalsync makes that extremely easy to complete. The duty of competence (Model Rule 1.1) now includes a duty of technological competence. Lawyers must understand how their AI tool works, its limitations, its data sources, and the security protocols to ensure its use is competent, ethical, and in the client's best interest.
Answer: Yes, if the training data is biased. AI algorithms are trained on vast datasets which may reflect historical or societal biases. If the AI is used for tasks like predictive analytics or bail determination, these biases can lead to discriminatory or unfair outcomes. Firms must vet their AI vendors for bias mitigation efforts.
Answer: Yes, but with extreme caution and proper controls. The lawyer must ensure the AI service provider contractually guarantees they will not breach confidentiality (e.g., by using the data for training) and that they maintain adequate security protocols (e.g., encryption, access controls) to prevent disclosure and the potential waiver of the privilege.
Answer: Routine, high-volume tasks with human review. The safest and most valuable uses include legal research, e-discovery, contract review, document summarization, and data analysis. These leverage AI's speed for efficiency gains while keeping the ultimate professional judgment with the lawyer.
Answer: It will change their roles, not necessarily eliminate them. AI is replacing much of the time-consuming, low-level work traditionally assigned to junior staff (e.g., initial document review). This shifts their training and responsibilities toward higher-value tasks involving critical thinking, strategic advice, and essential human oversight of AI outputs.
